Changes

Ureteral Stent

305 bytes removed, 22:54, 3 August 2008
/* Scenario */
# Compare document list with standard client document list.
# Check whether each specified document has appropriate content.
| Biomedical engineer
|-
| Verify if these input documents have been adequately linked to the product performance specifications.
|
| Biomedical engineer, Mechanical engineer
|-
!rowspan="3"|Product Performance Specifications (PPS)
| Verify that design inputs correlate adequately to the specifications and that appropriate design verification and validations (DV&V) are performed.
|
| Biomedical engineer
|-
| Also verify if DV&V criteria are based on risk management documentation or if the criteria are based on sound statistical sampling plans.
|
| Biomedical engineer, Mechanical engineer
|-
|-
| Verify that product performance specifications correspond to appropriate design output documents.
|
| Biomedical engineer, Mechanical engineer
|-
!rowspan="4"|Risk Management Documents
| Review Risk Analysis, Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA), Process FMEA, other risk management documentation.
|
| Biomedical engineer
|-
| Verify that DFMEA links appropriately to the PPS.
|
| Biomedical engineer, Mechanical engineer
|-
|-
| verify that appropriate DV&V reports and design output documents are reference correctly as risk mitigation activities in the DFMEA.
|
| Biomedical engineer, Mechanical engineer
|-
| Similarly verify that PFMEA links appropriately to the process validation protocol acceptance criteria and that in-process inspection procedures and/or manufacturing procedures are recorded as appropriate risk mitigation activities in the PFMEA.
|
| Biomedical engineer, Mechanical engineer
|-
|}