= Bilski Medtech Sample =
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="100%"
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''S.No.'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Publication No.'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Application Date'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Date of Publication'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Rejection type'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''Date of rejections'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''N/FR or FR'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''101 Rejection'''</font>
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''102 Rejection'''</font>
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''1'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060190302A1US20070034215A1|103 6/27/2006|2/15/2007|101 rejection|1/13/2009|N/FR|Claims 1-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 for nonstatutory subject matter. The invention is ineligible because it has not been limited to a substantial practical application and a tangible result. Instructions to transmit data does not result in a practical application and lacks a tangible result. The result has to be a practical application and a tangible result.
|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 19-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chaco et al., U.S. Patent 5,822,544 in view of Lichtman et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,819,107.
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''2'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060189976A1US20060190302A1|Rejection information not available12/23/2005|N8/A24/2006|103 rejection|2/5/2009|FR
|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 19-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chaco et al., U.S. Patent 5,822,544 in view of Lichtman et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,819,107.
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''3'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060195058A1
|12/21/2005
|8/31/2006
|102 rejection
|10/17/2008
|N/FR
|N/A
|Claims 1-26 and 41-54 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as obvious over Goldberger et al. (US Patent Application Publication US 200610079809).
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''4'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060195159A1US20060195144A1|12/19/2005|8/31/2006
|102 rejection
|12/23/2008
|N/FR
|N/A
|Claims 1-3, 5, 8-1 3, 16-1 8, & 12 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Bradley <br>DiLorenzo (US 200301 397816,366,813).
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''5'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060194724A1US20060200036A1|3/7/2005|9/7/2006|103 and 112 , 102 and 103 rejection|10/27/2008|FR
|N/A
|N/A|The rejection of claims Claims 1-1 62, 4425-4726, 49, 50-62, 6435-70 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103102(ab) as being unpatentable over Shafik (Andrologia. 1996. 28: 151 anticipated by "Detection of Atrial Persistent Rhythm Based on P-6) or Heiduschka et al. wave Recognition and RR Interval Variability" (Exp. Neurol. 2001. 171 : 1-10) in view of Burnett (World VR Zurro, AL Stelle, and J. UrolNadal, 2003Computers in Cardiology 1995, as cited by Applicant and hereinafter referred to as "Zurro").20: 337|Claims 3-342)5, US 6208894 (issued Mar 27,2001) and US 6464687 38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(issued Oct 15, 2002a) is withdrawn in response to Applicant<nowiki>’</nowiki>s amendment to the claims and cancellation of claims 2, 7, 46, 52-70as being obvious over Bock.|The rejection of claims 2, 7,46, 52Claims 24 and 34-70 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first second paragraph,<br>because as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the specification does not enable subject matter which applicant regards as the invention commensurate in scope with<br>the claims is moot because the claims are canceled.
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''6'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060195144A1US20060200071A1|12/21/2005|9/7/2006
|102 rejection
|12/11/2008
|N/FR
|N/A
|Claims 1-12 1 3, 15-23, and 21 25-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(be) as being anticipated by<br>DiLorenzo Gore et al. (US 6,366,8132004101 47034).
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''7'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060200025A1US20060203963A1|2/14/2006|9/14/2006
|102 and 103 rejection
|10/16/2008
|N/FR
|N/A
|Claims 1-21I , 29-422, 434, and 45 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(ba) as being anticipated by Foley Becker et al . (US Pat: Patent 6,167904,145161 BI).|Claims 223, 6-28 and 44 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Foley Becker et al (US Pat: Patent 6,167904,161 B1) in view of Lee (US Patent 4,838,14575) stand alone.
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''8'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060200034A1US20070032852A1|Rejection information not available8/15/2006|2/8/2007|102 rejection|2/11/2009|N/AFR
|N/A
|Claims 1 and 3 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (b) as being anticipated by White et al USPN 5,782,904.
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''9'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060200205A1US20070073124A1|9/29/2005|3/29/2007
|102 and 103 rejection
|2/4/2009
|N/FR
|N/A
|Claims 127, 328, 5-929, 11-1435, 1636, and 18-23 37, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by CohenAddison et al. (WO 2041075746).|Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17, 18-, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 , 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 41, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52, and 53 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Boveja, previously cited, Addison in view of TanaghoProchazka et al article (Decomposition And Reconstruction Methods In Biomedical Image De-Noising, herein Boveja in view of TanaghoProc. 1 6 th <nowiki>~</nowiki>ienniaIln t. EURASIP Conference BlOSlGNAL 2002, pp. 350-352, 2002)
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''10'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060200011A1US20070078306A1|Rejection information not available9/30/2005|N4/A5/2007|N112 and 102 rejection|1/A22/2009|FR
|N/A
|Claims 1-1 2 and 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Saracen et al (7,362,848)
|N/A
|Claims 1-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 11 2, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement.
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''11'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060200036A1US20060195159A1|12/5/2005|8/31/2006|112, 102 and 103 rejection|7/25/2008|FR|N/A|Claims 1-3, 5, 8-1 3, 16-1 8, & 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Bradley (US 200301 39781).|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1-2,25-26,35-37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by "Detection of Atrial Persistent Rhythm Based on P-wave Recognition and RR Interval Variability" (VR Zurro, AL Stelle, and J Nadal, Computers in Cardiology 1995, as cited by Applicant and hereinafter referred to as "Zurro").
|Claims 3-5,27, and 38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being obvious over Bock.
|Claims 24 and 34-45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention.
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''12'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060200071A1US20060194724A1|102 2/25/2005|8/31/2006|103 and 112 rejection|7/1/2008|FR
|N/A
|Claims 1-1 3, 15-23, and 25-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Gore et al. (US 2004101 47034).
|
|N/A
|The rejection of claims 1-1 6, 44-47, 49, 50-62, 64-70 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shafik (Andrologia. 1996. 28: 151 -6) or Heiduschka et al. (Exp. Neurol. 2001. 171 : 1-10) in view of Burnett (World J. Urol, 2003.20: 337-342), US 6208894 (issued Mar 27,2001) and US 6464687 (issued Oct 15, 2002) is withdrawn in response to Applicant<nowiki>’</nowiki>s amendment to the claims and cancellation of claims 2, 7, 46, 52-70.
|The rejection of claims 2, 7,46, 52-70 under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph,<br>because the specification does not enable the invention commensurate in scope with<br>the claims is moot because the claims are canceled.
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''13'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060203963A1US20060200025A1|12/1/2005|9/7/2006
|102 and 103 rejection
|8/6/2008
|N/FR
|N/A
|Claims I 1-21, 229-42,443, 5 and 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(ab) as being anticipated by Becker Foley et al. (US Patent Pat: 6,904167,161 BI145).|Claims 3, 622-9 28 and 44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Becker Foley et al (US Patent Pat: 6,904,161 B1) in view of Lee (US Patent 4,838167,75145)stand alone.
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''14'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060206169A1US20060200205A1|Rejection information not available3/1/2005|N9/A7/2006|N102 and 103 rejection|5/A30/2008|FR
|N/A
|Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11-14, 16, and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Cohen.
|Claims 1, 3, 6-9, 11, 12, 14, 16, and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Boveja, previously cited, in view of Tanagho, herein Boveja in view of Tanagho
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''15'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060212097A1
|2/24/2006
|9/21/2006
|102 rejection
|7/18/2008
|FR
|N/A
|Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Vock et al (2003/0163287 A1)
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''16'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060216333A1
|2/22/2006
|9/28/2006
|103 rejection
|9/10/2008
|N/FR
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''17'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060276709A1US20070060797A1|Rejection information not available8/31/2005|N3/A15/2007|102 rejection|4/3/2008|FR
|N/A
|Claims 1 - 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Rogers et al. U.S. Patent No. 6,957,107.
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''18'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060276856A1US20070073352A1|Rejection information not available9/28/2005|N3/29/2007|102 and 103 rejection|2/6/A2008|N/AFR
|N/A
|Claims 1-3,6-10,25-29 & 31-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Deno et al. (WO 031020364 A2).
|Claims 4-5 & 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deno et<br>al. (WO 031020364) in view of Frank et al. (US 5,265,615 A).
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''19'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060281990A1US20070078450A1|Rejection information not available9/30/2005|N4/A5/2007|N112, 102 and 103 rejection|5/14/A2008|N/AFR
|N/A
|Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Deckelbaum (U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,806).
|Claims 4-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deckelbaum (U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,806) in view of Alfano et al (U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,872).
|Claims 3, 7, 8 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement.
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''20'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20060281980A1US20070078320A1|Rejection information not available9/30/2005|N4/5/2007|102 and 103 rejection|6/27/A2008|N/AFR
|N/A
|Claims 1, 2, 8-12, 14-21, and 26-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Funderburk (US Patent 2004101 331 64).
|Claims 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Funderburk in view of Polcha (US Patent Application 2005101 97554).
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''21'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070027459A1US20070078678A1|Rejection information not available9/30/2005|N4/A5/2007|N102 and 103 rejection|9/A30/2008|FR
|N/A
|Claims 1-4, 6-7, 15-1 7, 19-22, 24-25, 34-36, 38, 40 and 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Z-Kat (WO 20041070580) as cited by applicant.
|Claims 5, 8-1 2, 18, 23, 26-31, 37, 39 and 41-42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Z-Kat as applied to claims 1 and 19 above, and further in view of Krause et al. (US Patent No. 6,711,432).
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''22'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070027487A1US20060189976A1|1/18/2006|8/24/2006
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''23'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070032734A1US20060200034A1|2/23/2006|9/7/2006
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''24'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070032852A1US20060200011A1|102 rejection2/2/2006|9/7/2006|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1 and 3 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (b) as being anticipated by White et al USPN 5,782,904.
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''25'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070038051A1US20060206169A1|5/8/2006|9/14/2006
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''26'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070034215A1US20060276709A1|101 rejection4/17/2006|Claims 1-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 for nonstatutory subject matter. The invention is ineligible because it has 12/7/2006|Rejection information not been limited to a substantial practical application and a tangible result. Instructions to transmit data does not result in a practical application and lacks a tangible result. The result has to be a practical application and a tangible result.available|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''27'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070060797A1US20060276856A1|102 rejection4/17/2006|12/7/2006|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1 - 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Rogers et al. U.S. Patent No. 6,957,107.
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''28'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070066904A1US20060281990A1|5/5/2006|12/14/2006
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''29'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070067190A1US20060281980A1|4/11/2006|12/14/2006
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''30'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070073180A1US20070027459A1|7/25/2006|2/1/2007
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''31'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070073124A1US20070027487A1|102 and 103 rejection10/13/2006|2/1/2007|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 27, 28, 29, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Addison et al. (WO 2041075746).
|Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 41, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52, and 53 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Addison in view of Prochazka et al article (Decomposition And Reconstruction Methods In Biomedical Image De-Noising, Proc. 1 6 th <nowiki>~</nowiki>ienniaIln t. EURASIP Conference BlOSlGNAL 2002, pp. 350-352, 2002)
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''32'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070073352A1US20070032734A1|102 and 103 rejection7/21/2006|2/8/2007|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1-3,6-10,25-29 & 31-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Deno et al. (WO 031020364 A2).
|Claims 4-5 & 30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deno et<br>al. (WO 031020364) in view of Frank et al. (US 5,265,615 A).
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''33'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070078306A1US20070038051A1|112 and 102 rejection5/26/2006|2/15/2007|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1-1 2 and 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Saracen et al (7,362,848)
|N/A
|Claims 1-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 11 2, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement.
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''34'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070078353A1US20070066904A1|9/13/2006|3/22/2007
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''35'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070078450A1US20070067190A1|112, 102 and 103 rejection9/19/2006|3/22/2007|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Deckelbaum (U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,806).
|Claims 4-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Deckelbaum (U.S. Pat. No. 4,785,806) in view of Alfano et al (U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,872).
|Claims 3, 7, 8 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement.
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''36'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070078320A1US20070073180A1|102 and 103 rejection9/26/2006|3/29/2007|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1, 2, 8-12, 14-21, and 26-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Funderburk (US Patent 2004101 331 64).
|Claims 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Funderburk in view of Polcha (US Patent Application 2005101 97554).
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''37'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070078678A1US20070078353A1|102 and 103 rejection10/4/2005|4/5/2007|Rejection information not available|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A
|N/A
|Claims 1-4, 6-7, 15-1 7, 19-22, 24-25, 34-36, 38, 40 and 45 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Z-Kat (WO 20041070580) as cited by applicant.
|Claims 5, 8-1 2, 18, 23, 26-31, 37, 39 and 41-42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Z-Kat as applied to claims 1 and 19 above, and further in view of Krause et al. (US Patent No. 6,711,432).
|N/A
|-
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''38'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070078335A1
|9/30/2005
|4/5/2007
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''39'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070083152A1
|8/25/2006
|4/12/2007
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|align = "center" bgcolor = "#808080"|<font color="#CCFFCC">'''40'''</font>
|align = "center"|US20070088195A1
|10/18/2005
|4/19/2007
|Rejection information not available
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A
|N/A