Difference between pages "Office Action Response" and "Office Action Sample 2- 14782783"
Venkatram.a (Talk | contribs) |
Venkatram.a (Talk | contribs) (→Prosecution Data Sheet) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | =='''Application-14/782,783'''== | ||
| − | + | The following is the Application-[http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&SeAct2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=20160057044.PGNR. 14/782,783] (filed Oct 6, 2015) for which Non-final Office action has been issued. In this Application, technology for reducing buffer overflow at a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Serving Gateway (S-GW) is described. <br> | |
| − | [ | + | |
| + | '''Title:''' Reduction of Buffer Overflow<br /> | ||
| + | '''Summary/Novelty of the invention:'''''A buffer overflow message may be received, at an evolved node B (eNB) from the S-GW, indicating potential overflow of downlink information at an S-GW buffer. The downlink information may be stored at the S-GW buffer until a plurality of user equipments (UEs) awake from a low power mode during a discontinuous reception (DRX) sleep cycle. One or more UEs may be selected from the plurality of UEs according to predefined criteria, wherein the one or more UEs are in a connected mode. The DRX configurations of the one or more UEs may be modified in order to reduce the downlink information that is stored at the S-GW buffer, thereby reducing the potential for overflow at the S-GW buffer.'' | ||
| + | * '''[[Media:Application_14782783.pdf|Application_14/782,783 PDF Document]]''' | ||
| − | + | =='''Non-final Office Action'''== | |
| + | The following is the Non-final Office action issued by the Examiner- '''Jason A. Harley''' (Art Unit 2468). The Office Action was issued on Dec 15, 2016.The Office Action contains 101 and 103 rejection. | ||
| + | * '''[[Media:Office Action_14782783.pdf|Non-final Office Action_14/782,783]]''' | ||
| − | = | + | =='''References cited in rejection'''== |
| − | + | ||
| + | The below listed files are the three cited references in the Non-final Office Action 14/782,783. | ||
| + | * '''[[Media:Primary Reference_Hsiao-20130223309.pdf|Primary Reference_Hsiao-20130223309]]''' | ||
| + | * '''[[Media:Secondary Reference1_Maeda-20090180414.pdf|Secondary Reference1_Maeda-20090180414]]''' | ||
| + | * '''[[Media:Secondary Reference2_Donthi-20140161007.pdf|Secondary Reference2_Donthi-20140161007]]''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | ='''PHASE 1:'''= | ||
| + | =='''Claim vs Reference chart'''== | ||
| − | + | The following Claim vs Reference chart lists out claim and reference wise rejection. This chart provides birds eye-view of the claims in the Application and the rejections given by Examiner and the corresponding references cited against the claims. | |
| + | * '''[[Media:Claim Vs Reference Chart_14782783.docx|Claim Vs Reference Chart_14/782,783]]''' | ||
| + | [[File:Screen Shot 2017-03-06 at 2.51.48 pm.png|framed|center|Claim Vs Reference chart]] | ||
| − | ==''' | + | =='''Examiner Analytics'''== |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | The Examiner Analytics chart gives the overall analytics for a particular examiner such as Examiner Allowance rate for RCE, Appeals and Examiner Interviews. | |
| − | + | * '''[[Media:Examiner Analytics.docx|Examiner Analytics]]''' | |
| − | + | [[File:Screen Shot 2017-03-06 at 2.54.01 pm.png|thumnail|center|Examiner Statistics]] | |
| − | ==''' | + | =='''Prosecution Data Sheet'''== |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | The below Prosecution Data Sheet (PDS) is a brief of the proposed amendment/argument. | ||
| + | # Provides the extension dates after the statutory period and the corresponding fees applicable for each extension | ||
| + | # Provides reference validation check (whether the reference cited by examiner is valid) | ||
| + | # Provides proposed response to each Rejection/Objection and other strategies to claim the white spaces in the Application. | ||
| + | # Gives recommendations based on Examiner statistics | ||
| + | * '''[[Media:Prosecution Data Sheet_14782783.docx|Prosecution Data Sheet_14/782,783]]''' | ||
| + | [[File:Screen Shot 2017-03-07 at 6.29.35 pm.png|framed|center|Prosecution Data Sheet]] | ||
| − | + | ='''PHASE 2:'''= | |
| + | =='''Complete Office Action Response'''== | ||
| − | + | The following Office action response is the complete draft which contains all the response to obviate/rebut the rejection used by the Examiner against the Application. | |
| − | + | * '''[[Media:Office Action Response_14782783.docx|Complete Office Action Response_14/782,78314782783]]''' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | [[Office Action | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 05:02, 7 March 2017
Contents
Application-14/782,783
The following is the Application-14/782,783 (filed Oct 6, 2015) for which Non-final Office action has been issued. In this Application, technology for reducing buffer overflow at a Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Serving Gateway (S-GW) is described.
Title: Reduction of Buffer Overflow
Summary/Novelty of the invention:A buffer overflow message may be received, at an evolved node B (eNB) from the S-GW, indicating potential overflow of downlink information at an S-GW buffer. The downlink information may be stored at the S-GW buffer until a plurality of user equipments (UEs) awake from a low power mode during a discontinuous reception (DRX) sleep cycle. One or more UEs may be selected from the plurality of UEs according to predefined criteria, wherein the one or more UEs are in a connected mode. The DRX configurations of the one or more UEs may be modified in order to reduce the downlink information that is stored at the S-GW buffer, thereby reducing the potential for overflow at the S-GW buffer.
Non-final Office Action
The following is the Non-final Office action issued by the Examiner- Jason A. Harley (Art Unit 2468). The Office Action was issued on Dec 15, 2016.The Office Action contains 101 and 103 rejection.
References cited in rejection
The below listed files are the three cited references in the Non-final Office Action 14/782,783.
- Primary Reference_Hsiao-20130223309
- Secondary Reference1_Maeda-20090180414
- Secondary Reference2_Donthi-20140161007
PHASE 1:
Claim vs Reference chart
The following Claim vs Reference chart lists out claim and reference wise rejection. This chart provides birds eye-view of the claims in the Application and the rejections given by Examiner and the corresponding references cited against the claims.
Examiner Analytics
The Examiner Analytics chart gives the overall analytics for a particular examiner such as Examiner Allowance rate for RCE, Appeals and Examiner Interviews.
Prosecution Data Sheet
The below Prosecution Data Sheet (PDS) is a brief of the proposed amendment/argument.
- Provides the extension dates after the statutory period and the corresponding fees applicable for each extension
- Provides reference validation check (whether the reference cited by examiner is valid)
- Provides proposed response to each Rejection/Objection and other strategies to claim the white spaces in the Application.
- Gives recommendations based on Examiner statistics
PHASE 2:
Complete Office Action Response
The following Office action response is the complete draft which contains all the response to obviate/rebut the rejection used by the Examiner against the Application.
